Wellington Balloon Festival, Articles E

A decision by the editor in chief is the . Weigh all of your options and look at the merits of the rejection. Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. If Nature's editors agree to reconsider a paper, the other original referee(s) will have the chance to see and comment on the report of the referee who is the subject of the complaint. Please include what you were doing when this page came up and the Cloudflare Ray ID found at the bottom of this page. Authors subsequently receive an e-proof, including the figures, and can also download a PDF proof of the layout. youre still in the running. How do I write an inquiry to the editor about my manuscript's current status? We understand your anxiety :-) However, the decision on manuscript acceptance depends on several factors, such as availability and responsiveness of peer reviewers and the extent of revisions recommended. If a paper was considered insufficiently novel or interesting to merit high-profile publication, we are unlikely to reconsider simply because the authors disagree. ISSN 1476-4687 (online) if you strongly disagree with the editorial decision, you can appeal against it unless the editor has clearly specified otherwise. If the editor is satisfied with your work, they will choose appropriate peer reviewers to evaluate your work, taking into account several factors including expertise, experience . Answer (1 of 7): Most submissions are rejected by editors without review, and this should be fast - perhaps, two weeks (?). Journalists have embargoedaccess to papers via the Nature Research press site, and are permitted to show papers to independent specialists a few days in advance of publication, under embargo conditions, solely for the purpose of eliciting comment on the work described. Yes Hello. This scheme only applies to original research Articles, and not to Review articles or to other published content. Which type of forging is used for Flashless forging? Many papers are published online ahead of print publication date: corresponding authors of these papers will be informed by e-mail when the online publication date is confirmed, one week ahead of publication. But in June 2022, the journal was removed from SCI indexing, what can i do, so much of work in it with two revsions taking more than a year,what can be done, Why is a PhD essential to become a peer-reviewer. 2022.5.11 Manuscript under submission/Manuscript received, 2022.5.12 Editor assigned/Manuscript under consideration, 6.2Manuscript under considerationNS, Decision sent to author, NZip for reviewers, 9All Reviewers Assigned109Manuscript under consideration, 2022.10.10 Manuscript under consideration/Decision sent to author/Waiting for revision, , comments, #1, #2, #3IMEC&, 2022.11.23 Manuscript under submission/Manuscript received/Editor assigned/Manuscript under consideration (), 2022.11.25 Editor Decision Started (All Reviewer Assigned), 1212All Reviewer AssignedManuscript under consideration, 2022.12.13 Manuscript under consideration/Decision sent to author/Waiting for revision, #1hhhh, #3comment. Nature (Nature) Table 11 sketches the different situations the editor may encounter and the decision s/he usually makes in each of these situations. What is the meaning of "decision in process" status? Papers are evaluated along multiple dimensions, including technical reliability, novelty and interest, but the final decision to accept or reject must collapse all this information into a single binary choice. How much time does the scientific journal 'Nature' take from - Quora EDIT: As Strongbad points out in a comment the term Awaiting Editors Decision strictly indicates that the paper has passed reviewers. The following decision types are available: Reject; Major revision; Minor revision; Accept; Decisions are communicated to the corresponding author in a formal letter, along with reviewer feedback and any other requirements from the . editor decision started nature rejection - bobmarleypeace.com var d=new Date(); yr=d.getFullYear();document.write(yr); A final decision on publication is deferred, pending the authors response to the referees comments. Nature is reluctant to consult new referees unless there is a particular, relevant area of scientific expertise that was lacking in the referees already used. . Answer (1 of 4): Hi! And "wish you the best in your future endeavors" is the rejection letter equivalent of your crush signing "Have a great summer" in your yearbook. 172.104.52.81 Editorial criteria and processes | Nature //--> We understand your anxiety :-) However, the decision on manuscript acceptance depends on several factors, such as availability and responsiveness of peer reviewers and the extent of revisions recommended. 2. Figures for recent years (original research only) are shown in the table below: Nature does not employ an editorial board of senior scientists, nor is it affiliated to a scientific society or institution, thus its decisions are independent, unbiased by scientific or national prejudices of particular individuals. At times, they may ask you to revise and resubmit the manuscript. Theoretically Correct vs Practical Notation. Nature is a British weekly scientific journal founded and based in London, England.As a multidisciplinary publication, Nature features peer-reviewed research from a variety of academic disciplines, mainly in science and technology. Often, Editors reject the manuscript because the analytical approach is not sufficiently rigorous, explicit and argued, or because the results are barely significant or representative. How long time should we wait for editor decision on a manuscript? and However, because the number of appeals has been growing to the point that it threatens to overwhelm our editorial resources, we have recently implemented a new system for considering them. Decisions by editors are routinely made very rapidly after receipt of reports, and Nature offers an advance online publication (AOP) service to an increasing number of manuscripts. You can email the site owner to let them know you were blocked. A reject decision at this stage is final and cannot be reversed. How long should we wait if the current status of the manuscript is [CDATA[> typoresubmitstagedecision sent to author&, proofproofnaturepublish, ScienceNatureScienceScience, Editor assigned (Peer-review) (discovery) (invention)novelunexpected)The criteria for a paper to be sent for peer-review are that the results seem novel, arresting (illuminating, unexpected or surprising), and that the work described has both immediate and far-reaching implicationsnaturescienceBoard of Reviewing EditorsscienceBoard of Reviewing EditorsBoard of Reviewing EditorsnaturescienceBoard of Reviewing Editorsscienceconnection, 22, Peer-review, Peer-review, 2. At each stage, the editor will discuss the manuscript with editorial colleagues in the light of referees reports, and send a letter to the author offering one of the following options: Editors letters also contain detailed guidance about the papers format and style where appropriate (see below), which should be read in conjunction with the manuscript formatting guide when revising and resubmitting. The content of the press release mailing and papers described therein is embargoed until 1600 London time/1100 US Eastern Time on the day of publication, which is the time at which the research is published and become publicly available. Under these circumstances, revised papers are not usually sent back to the referees because further technical work has not been required, but are accepted for publication once the editors have checked that the referees suggestions have been implemented and the paper is in the required format (the. Do the revisions and resubmit. All Articles published in Nature go through at least one round of review, usually two or three, sometimes more. The editor will then decide whether to accept your work as is, request minor or major revisions, or reject the paper due to unresolvable concerns. [CDATA[// >Journal Said "Major Revisions" Needed? Here's What to Do Directly from with editor, to decision under process. Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link. The author submits a manuscript and it receives a tracking number. The main editor is usually quite quick (a couple of days or so) because their just gauging scope and relavence. Peer review comments, cover letter and more. the editor usually submits a brief comment on the article to the editor in chief who then has the final say and will make the decision available to you. You said the finals started tomorrow. Is it fair to reject manuscript with few words of comments after long 9 months of review?